Mark Melchers
Landlord and Tenant Board (LTB) Adjudicator Past Decisions
Overview
189
52
15
10
Order OutcomesPRO
Eviction Relief Granted to Tenant 15 Orders since 2024PRO
Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Unlock Full Access to Mark Melchers's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Mark Melchers typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Lanlord's Notice Found Invalid 10 Orders since 2024PRO
Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Unlock Full Access to Mark Melchers's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Mark Melchers typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Contested Dispute by CategoryPRO
- Maintenance Issues7
Landlord Win Rate: 42.86%
- Persistent Late Payment6
Landlord Win Rate: 50%
- Property Damage6
Landlord Win Rate: 83.33%
- Illegal Act3
Landlord Win Rate: 66.67%
- Safety Concerns3
Landlord Win Rate: 33.33%
- Bad Faith Eviction2
Landlord Win Rate: 100%
Unlock Full Access to Mark Melchers's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Mark Melchers typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Latest Orders
Shishman v Patel
LTB dismisses tenant's application, ruling the tenancy is exempt from the RTA because the tenant shared a kitchen with the owner.
London tenants awarded over $2,600 in rent abatement after their landlords failed to fix numerous maintenance issues, including an unsafe deck.
Landlords' eviction attempt fails due to a critical procedural error: filing a different N12 notice than the one served to the tenant.
Pembertin Realty Ltd. v Leroux
LTB denies landlord's review request, confirming that without a no-smoking clause and sufficient proof, smoking in a unit does not warrant eviction for substantial interference.
The LTB ruled that the Residential Tenancies Act does not apply because no tenancy agreement was formed when an acquaintance, without authority, allowed an individual to park a trailer on a farm property.
Xu v Eroglu
LTB clarifies it has no jurisdiction to order a guarantor to pay a tenant's rent arrears, amending a previous order.
Shishman v Patel
LTB dismisses tenant's application, ruling the tenancy is exempt from the RTA because the tenant shared a kitchen with the owner.
London tenants awarded over $2,600 in rent abatement after their landlords failed to fix numerous maintenance issues, including an unsafe deck.
Landlords' eviction attempt fails due to a critical procedural error: filing a different N12 notice than the one served to the tenant.
Pembertin Realty Ltd. v Leroux
LTB denies landlord's review request, confirming that without a no-smoking clause and sufficient proof, smoking in a unit does not warrant eviction for substantial interference.
The LTB ruled that the Residential Tenancies Act does not apply because no tenancy agreement was formed when an acquaintance, without authority, allowed an individual to park a trailer on a farm property.
Xu v Eroglu
LTB clarifies it has no jurisdiction to order a guarantor to pay a tenant's rent arrears, amending a previous order.
Shishman v Patel
LTB dismisses tenant's application, ruling the tenancy is exempt from the RTA because the tenant shared a kitchen with the owner.
London tenants awarded over $2,600 in rent abatement after their landlords failed to fix numerous maintenance issues, including an unsafe deck.
Landlords' eviction attempt fails due to a critical procedural error: filing a different N12 notice than the one served to the tenant.
Pembertin Realty Ltd. v Leroux
LTB denies landlord's review request, confirming that without a no-smoking clause and sufficient proof, smoking in a unit does not warrant eviction for substantial interference.
The LTB ruled that the Residential Tenancies Act does not apply because no tenancy agreement was formed when an acquaintance, without authority, allowed an individual to park a trailer on a farm property.
Xu v Eroglu
LTB clarifies it has no jurisdiction to order a guarantor to pay a tenant's rent arrears, amending a previous order.
Shishman v Patel
LTB dismisses tenant's application, ruling the tenancy is exempt from the RTA because the tenant shared a kitchen with the owner.
London tenants awarded over $2,600 in rent abatement after their landlords failed to fix numerous maintenance issues, including an unsafe deck.
Landlords' eviction attempt fails due to a critical procedural error: filing a different N12 notice than the one served to the tenant.
Pembertin Realty Ltd. v Leroux
LTB denies landlord's review request, confirming that without a no-smoking clause and sufficient proof, smoking in a unit does not warrant eviction for substantial interference.
The LTB ruled that the Residential Tenancies Act does not apply because no tenancy agreement was formed when an acquaintance, without authority, allowed an individual to park a trailer on a farm property.
Xu v Eroglu
LTB clarifies it has no jurisdiction to order a guarantor to pay a tenant's rent arrears, amending a previous order.
Unlock Full Access to Mark Melchers's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Mark Melchers typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Latest Insights from Our Blog
Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions
Unauthorized Occupants, Assignments, and Subletting: Understanding Ontario's Complex Tenancy Transfer Rules
A comprehensive analysis of LTB cases reveals the strict rules governing tenant assignments and subletting, the severe consequences of unauthorized occupancy, and the substantial financial penalties that follow. Learn when transfers are legal and how to protect your rights.
Utility Billing Disputes and Illegal Charges: Understanding Your Rights in Ontario's Rental Market
An in-depth analysis of utility billing disputes at Ontario's LTB reveals common overcharging practices, jurisdictional limitations, and the financial consequences for both landlords and tenants when utility agreements go wrong.
Short-Term Rentals and the LTB: When Airbnb Meets Ontario's Rental Laws
Navigate the complex intersection of short-term rentals, municipal bylaws, and Ontario's Residential Tenancies Act. Learn when the LTB has jurisdiction, how Airbnb affects tenancy rights, and what landlords and tenants need to know about this evolving legal landscape.
Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered
Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.
Find Legal Professionals
Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.
Browse ProfessionalsPost Your Legal Needs
Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.
Post a BountyJoin thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform